Akasha Urhobo vs Welles Newman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Nov at 04:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Urhobo vs W. Newman

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Urhobo 1 - 0 Newman
They have played 2 sets in total, with Akasha Urhobo winning 2 and Welles Newman winning 0. The last match between Akasha Urhobo and Welles Newman was at the W35 Orlando, 13-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Akasha Urhobo getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Urhobo | 1 |
| Newman | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Orlando(11-13-25)
A. Urhobo vs W. Newman H2H Profile
A. Urhobo vs W. Newman Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Akasha Urhobo has a stronger second serve, winning 43.51% of points compared to Welles Newman's 36.36%. Could this give Urhobo an upper hand?
- Return Game Stats: Newman has been more effective on second serve returns, winning 48.92% of these points, while Urhobo is at 46.02%. On first serve returns, Urhobo excels with 29.13% compared to Newman's 22.97%.
- Breakpoints Under Pressure: Urhobo has been better at saving breakpoints, with a rate of 50.00% compared to Newman's 44.26%. Might this resilience make a difference in key match moments?
- Recent Match Performance: Newman has a higher overall match win percentage over the last year (66.67%) compared to Urhobo's 59.09%.
- Surface Proficiency: Both players have shown high proficiency on clay, with Newman and Urhobo both having 67% win rates. However, Urhobo struggles on indoor hard surfaces with a 20% win rate, suggesting clay might suit both evenly.
- Player Level Participation: Newman has won 62.50% of matches in lower-level tournaments, slightly leading Urhobo's 60.47%. How might the level of competition each has faced impact their match readiness?
- Opponent Quality: Urhobo has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 401.05, while Newman's opponents averaged a rank of 571.22. Could this experience against stronger foes benefit Urhobo?
- Deciding Set Performance: If the match reaches a deciding set, Urhobo holds an advantage, having won 36% of such sets compared to Newman's 0% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):
Comparing relevant statistics reveals varied strengths for each player. Akasha Urhobo’s superior second serve performance and resilience under pressure could provide a crucial edge over Welles Newman in tight match situations.
While Newman's recent match-winning streak and effective return game pose significant challenges for Urhobo, Urhobo's experience against higher-ranked opponents and proficiency in deciding sets could prove pivotal.
Given the comparative analysis, Akasha Urhobo seems more likely to win this upcoming match against Welles Newman, leveraging their small but statistically notable advantages.
Akasha Urhobo vs Welles Newman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Urhobo vs W. Newman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:20:24 | Average Match Time | 1:20:24 |
| 67% (33/49) | 1st Serve % | 60% (28/47) |
| 73% (24/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (9/19) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 51% (24/47) | Return Points Win % | 31% (15/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Urhobo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 0-6 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 6-3 | ||
SF | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
W. Newman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 7-5 | ||

A. Urhobo vs W. Newman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.57% (82/58) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 58.23% (184/132) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 53.84% (1537/1318) | Games Win/Loss | 54.39% (93/78) |
| 47.06% (24/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.86% (57/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 224 | Aces Total | 12 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 315 | Total Double Faults | 20 |
| 1:20:3 | Average Match Time | 1:9:19 |
| 408.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 557.3 |
| 68% (5285/7804) | 1st Serve % | 60% (268/447) |
| 61% (3217/5285) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (180/268) |
| 49% (1230/2520) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (83/179) |
| 48% (498/1045) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (32/61) |
| 46% (3718/8045) | Return Points Win % | 48% (215/449) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.54% (78/53) | Challenger W/L | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 80.00% (4/1) | Futures W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 58% (81/139) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (6/10) |
| 45% (9/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (16/37) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 89% (88/78) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (6/6) |
| 11% (88/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (6/0) |
| 8% (52/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (4/0) |